Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0286295, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237690

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on essential primary healthcare services at public primary healthcare facilities. METHODS: The number of weekly consultations for antenatal care (ANC), outpatient (OPD), immunisations (EPI), family planning (FP) and HIV services, between January 2018 and December 2020, were collected from 25 facilities in Masaka district, Uganda, 21 in Goma, and 29 in Kambia district, Sierra Leone. Negative binomial regression models accounting for clustering and season were used to analyse changes in activity levels between 2018, 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: In Goma, we found no change in OPD, EPI or ANC consultations, FP was 17% lower in March-July 2020 compared to 2019, but this recovered by December 2020. New diagnoses of HIV were 34% lower throughout 2020 compared to 2019. In Sierra Leone, compared to the same periods in 2019, facilities had 18-29% fewer OPD consultations throughout 2020, and 27% fewer DTP3 doses in March-July 2020. There was no evidence of differences in other services. In Uganda there were 20-35% fewer under-5 OPD consultations, 21-66% fewer MCV1 doses, and 48-51% fewer new diagnoses of HIV throughout 2020, compared to 2019. There was no difference in the number of HPV doses delivered. CONCLUSIONS: The level of disruption varied across the different settings and qualitatively appeared to correlate with the strength of lockdown measures and reported attitudes towards the risk posed by COVID-19. Mitigation strategies such as health communications campaigns and outreach services may be important to limit the impact of lockdowns on primary healthcare services.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Sierra Leona/epidemiología , Uganda/epidemiología , República Democrática del Congo , Pandemias , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Atención Prenatal , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
European Journal of Public Health ; 32:III436-III436, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2311022
3.
European journal of public health ; 32(Suppl 3), 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2102651

RESUMEN

Background COVID-19 changed access to healthcare, including vaccinations, in the United Kingdom (UK). This study explored UK women’s experiences of accessing pertussis vaccination during pregnancy and infant vaccinations during COVID-19. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was completed, between 3rd August-11th October 2020, by 1404 women aged 16+ years who were pregnant at some point after the first UK lockdown from March 23rd 2020. Ten follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results Most women surveyed were pregnant (65.7%) and a third postnatal (34.3%). Almost all women (95.6%) were aware that pertussis vaccination is recommended in pregnancy. Most pregnant (72.1%) and postnatal women (84.0%) had received pertussis vaccination however, access issues were reported. Over a third (39.6%) of women had a pregnancy vaccination appointment changed. COVID-19 made it physically difficult to access pregnancy vaccinations for one fifth (21.5%) of women and physically difficult to access infant vaccinations for almost half of women (45.8%). Nearly half of women (45.2%) reported feeling less safe attending pregnancy vaccinations and over three quarters (76.3%) less safe attending infant vaccinations due to COVID-19. The majority (94.2%) felt it was important to get their baby vaccinated during COVID-19. Pregnant women from ethnic-minorities and lower-income households were less likely to have been vaccinated. Minority-ethnicity women were more likely to report access problems and feeling less safe attending vaccinations for both themselves and their babies. Qualitative analysis found women experienced difficulties accessing antenatal care and relied on knowledge from previous pregnancies to access vaccine appointments. Conclusions COVID-19 disrupted access to vaccinations in the UK. Vaccine services must ensure equitable access to vaccine appointments during ongoing and future pandemics including tailoring services for lower income and ethnic minority families. Key messages • Pregnancy and infant vaccines was disrupted by COVID-19 with women feeling less safe and having difficulties accessing vaccinations with ethnic minority women more likely to report access issues. • Equitable access to routine pregnancy and infant vaccine appointments must be prioritised during future pandemics, including considering tailoring services for different population groups.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA